Google
 
Webnews.only-4-geeks.com
Interesting places
news.only-4-geeks.com Forum Index » Python

exec(code) not allowing import on top level?

 
Jump to:  
 
Peter Teuben
PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 1:26 am    Post subject: exec(code) not allowing import on top level?
       
if I define a simple string code, with the following contents:

import math
def foo(x):
return math.sqrt(x)

and i run it using exec(code) in python, math is not known. But when I
recode the string as:

def foo(x):
import math
return math.sqrt(x)

it works fine. That seemed like an inconsistency, since it works
fine otherwise, as expected. It's easy to work around, but
just odd to find this out.

thanks

peter
 

 
Gary Herron
PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 2:17 am    Post subject: Re: exec(code) not allowing import on top level?
       
Peter Teuben wrote:
Quote:

if I define a simple string code, with the following contents:

import math
def foo(x):
return math.sqrt(x)

What? You have not told us something important here. First, that code
won't fail because it does not even execute the function foo -- it just
defines it. Second, if I exend your string with one more line
"foo(123)" to actually execute the code, it still works as expected.

So let's try this again... and this time please please also show us the
full text of the error message.

Gary Herron


Quote:

and i run it using exec(code) in python, math is not known. But when I
recode the string as:

def foo(x):
import math
return math.sqrt(x)

it works fine. That seemed like an inconsistency, since it works
fine otherwise, as expected. It's easy to work around, but
just odd to find this out.

thanks

peter
--
LINK
 

 
Gary Herron
PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 2:18 am    Post subject: Re: exec(code) not allowing import on top level?
       
Peter Teuben wrote:
Quote:

if I define a simple string code, with the following contents:

import math
def foo(x):
return math.sqrt(x)

What? You have not told us something important here. First, that code
won't fail because it does not even execute the function foo -- it just
defines it. Second, if I extended your string with one more line
"foo(123)" to actually execute the code, it still works as expected.

So let's try this again... and this time please please also show us the
full text of the error message.

Gary Herron


Quote:

and i run it using exec(code) in python, math is not known. But when I
recode the string as:

def foo(x):
import math
return math.sqrt(x)

it works fine. That seemed like an inconsistency, since it works
fine otherwise, as expected. It's easy to work around, but
just odd to find this out.

thanks

peter
--
LINK
 

 
Steven D'Aprano
PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 6:43 am    Post subject: Re: exec(code) not allowing import on top level?
       
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:26:45 +0000, Peter Teuben wrote:

Quote:
if I define a simple string code, with the following contents:

import math
def foo(x):
return math.sqrt(x)

and i run it using exec(code) in python, math is not known.


Works for me.


Quote:
code = """import math
.... def foo(x):

.... return math.sqrt(x)
.... """
Quote:

exec code
foo(25)
5.0


By the way, exec is a statement, not a function, so you don't need the
brackets.



--
Steven
 

 
Peter Otten
PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 9:48 am    Post subject: Re: exec(code) not allowing import on top level?
       
Peter Teuben wrote:

Quote:

if I define a simple string code, with the following contents:

import math
def foo(x):
return math.sqrt(x)

The

import math

statement puts 'math' in the local namespace, and foo looks it up in the
global namespace. This can only work when these namespaces are the same:

Quote:
code = """
.... import math

.... def foo(x):
.... return math.sqrt(x)
.... print foo(2)
.... """
Quote:
exec code in {}
1.41421356237
exec code in {}, {}
Traceback (most recent call last):

File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "<string>", line 5, in <module>
File "<string>", line 4, in foo
NameError: global name 'math' is not defined

You could argue that Python should always look into the local namespace and
then fall back to the global namespace but that would be fruitless extra
work in most cases. I think it can only hapen with exec/eval, and as you
have seen in the other responses even there it works on the module level
because -- tada!

Quote:
globals() is locals()
True


Quote:
and i run it using exec(code) in python, math is not known. But when I
recode the string as:

def foo(x):
import math
return math.sqrt(x)

Here Python "guesses" that math is a local variable and that guess is
correct. If you wrote

import math
def foo(x):
return math.sqrt(x)
math = 42

Python would still guess that math is a local name and you would end up with
a runtime exception.

Peter
 

Page 1 of 1 .:.

Google
 
Webnews.only-4-geeks.com

Windows Update | C++ | C | PHP | JavaScript | Photoshop | Programming | Windows 2000 | Python | Windows XP | Object | Flash | Flash - ActionScript | Paint Shop Pro | Excel | PowerPoint | Access | Word | Windows 98 | Internet Explorer 6.0 | CorelDraw12 | Java | XML | asm x86 | Linux Mandrake | Linux RedHat | Outlook |  | news from newsgroups |_ | s

Web Templates

Awesome Website Templates ©

Fotka opisy na gg Księgowość bet365 monitoring wizyjny