|  | Seriously, though, about LLVM | | |
| | | mk |  |
|  Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 2:06 pm Post subject: Seriously, though, about LLVM |  |
LINK
This project has gained some publicity. There's IronPython, right, so
has anybody thought about implementing Python using LLVM as backend, as
it seems not out of question at all? |
| |
| | | Fredrik Lundh | |
| | Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 2:16 pm Post subject: Re: Seriously, though, about LLVM | |
mk wrote:
| Quote: | This project has gained some publicity. There's IronPython, right, so
has anybody thought about implementing Python using LLVM as backend, as
it seems not out of question at all?
|
you mean like:
LINK
?
</F> |
| |
| | | mk | |
| | Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:49 pm Post subject: Re: Seriously, though, about LLVM | |
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
| Quote: | mk wrote:
This project has gained some publicity. There's IronPython, right, so
has anybody thought about implementing Python using LLVM as backend,
as it seems not out of question at all?
you mean like:
LINK
?
|
No, I don't mean "Python written in Python", with whatever backend. |
| |
| | | Fredrik Lundh | |
| | Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 6:55 pm Post subject: Re: Seriously, though, about LLVM | |
mk wrote:
| Quote: | This project has gained some publicity. There's IronPython, right, so
has anybody thought about implementing Python using LLVM as backend,
as it seems not out of question at all?
you mean like:
LINK
?
No, I don't mean "Python written in Python", with whatever backend.
|
so anyone attempting to write a Python implementation for the LLVM
aren't allowed to use Python for the front-end? why not?
</F> |
| |
|
|
