Google
 
Webnews.only-4-geeks.com
Interesting places
news.only-4-geeks.com Forum Index » Windows 98Goto page 1, 2  Next

Free Advertising

 
Jump to:  
 
Gizmo
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:40 am    Post subject: Free Advertising
       
In an effort to increase traffic to our new news group we now offering FREE
UNMODERATED chat and advertising

just go to

free.uk.retail.poundland.staff.chat
 

 
Dan
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 1:01 am    Post subject: No Thanks for the Spam
       
Just the Usual Spam
 

 
BoaterDave
PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 3:53 pm    Post subject: Re: No Thanks for the Spam
       
On 12 Aug, 04:01, Dan <D...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
Quote:
Just the Usual Spam

Responding from Google Groups with a copy of the message I've just
posted through OE6.

By "using OE6" I *did* mean logged on to msnews.microsoft.com (using
OE6) - as I've already mentioned, Google Groups will not allow me to
post.

NO WAIT! This link
LINK

is now *active* and would allow me to post. (scratches head!).
However, if you follow the link you will see that no-one has replied
to Dan in the thread - not even me. Ve...ery strange!

There is absolutely *no* reference to the message to which Dan (OP)
originally replied showing on this machine.

I find that strange too.

Can no-one provide a better explanation than those already given?

TIA

Dave

--
 

 
Gary S. Terhune
PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 6:35 pm    Post subject: Re: No Thanks for the Spam
       
Which explanation is it that you're referring to? The one you seem to think
is deficient?

--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
LINK

"BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3fc6063c-5c06-4eb1-a041-e8abd2c610a0@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
On 12 Aug, 04:01, Dan <D...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
Just the Usual Spam

Responding from Google Groups with a copy of the message I've just
posted through OE6.

By "using OE6" I *did* mean logged on to msnews.microsoft.com (using
OE6) - as I've already mentioned, Google Groups will not allow me to
post.

NO WAIT! This link
LINK

is now *active* and would allow me to post. (scratches head!).
However, if you follow the link you will see that no-one has replied
to Dan in the thread - not even me. Ve...ery strange!

There is absolutely *no* reference to the message to which Dan (OP)
originally replied showing on this machine.

I find that strange too.

Can no-one provide a better explanation than those already given?

TIA

Dave

--
 

 
~BD~
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:35 am    Post subject: Re: No Thanks for the Spam
       
"Gary S. Terhune" <none> wrote in message
news:ekqnPjKAJHA.1016@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
Quote:
Which explanation is it that you're referring to? The one you seem to
think is deficient?

--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
LINK

Gary ........... you are quite correct when elsewhere you refer to me being
an idiot! ;)

I posted my last message here to the wrong 'No Thanks' thread started by
Dan. I then realised my error. I then posted the following message in the
*other* thread:-

*************************************

*Apology*

I've found the original SPAM - here: LINK

Using Google there are TWO separate (but similar) groups.

!.
LINK

2.
LINK

I'm sorry to have persisted with this query - but there must always be
a reason for - well, everything! <wink!>

Dave

**************************************

I trust this explains matters. I'm sorry for making the error. :(

Dave
 

 
Dan
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:24 pm    Post subject: Re: No Thanks for the Spam
       
Good, BD and Gary -- how about you guys -- forgive -- shake hands and let us
move on --- yes -- Microsoft removed the original spam -- end of story

"~BD~" wrote:

Quote:

"Gary S. Terhune" <none> wrote in message
news:ekqnPjKAJHA.1016@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
Which explanation is it that you're referring to? The one you seem to
think is deficient?

--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
LINK

Gary ........... you are quite correct when elsewhere you refer to me being
an idiot! ;)

I posted my last message here to the wrong 'No Thanks' thread started by
Dan. I then realised my error. I then posted the following message in the
*other* thread:-

*************************************

*Apology*

I've found the original SPAM - here: LINK

Using Google there are TWO separate (but similar) groups.

!.
LINK

2.
LINK

I'm sorry to have persisted with this query - but there must always be
a reason for - well, everything! <wink!

Dave

**************************************

I trust this explains matters. I'm sorry for making the error. :(

Dave





 

 
Jeff Richards
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:37 pm    Post subject: Re: No Thanks for the Spam
       
and can you also please note that it is much easier for MS to remove the
original spam if there are no replies to it.
--
Jeff Richards
MS MVP (Windows - Shell/User)
"Dan" <Dan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:0A6F6BA1-6F0E-4D37-9FA7-EDB9A1FB575E@microsoft.com...
Quote:
Good, BD and Gary -- how about you guys -- forgive -- shake hands and let
us
move on --- yes -- Microsoft removed the original spam -- end of story
 

 
Dan
PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 2:04 am    Post subject: Re: No Thanks for the Spam
       
okay

"Jeff Richards" wrote:

Quote:
and can you also please note that it is much easier for MS to remove the
original spam if there are no replies to it.
--
Jeff Richards
MS MVP (Windows - Shell/User)
"Dan" <Dan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:0A6F6BA1-6F0E-4D37-9FA7-EDB9A1FB575E@microsoft.com...
Good, BD and Gary -- how about you guys -- forgive -- shake hands and let
us
move on --- yes -- Microsoft removed the original spam -- end of story



 

 
~BD~
PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:11 pm    Post subject: Re: No Thanks for the Spam
       
Your comment is noted, Jeff.

Are you, kind of, suggesting that employees of Microsoft do, in fact,
monitor what happens in these newsgroups (Communities), check the advice
posted and make sure all links posted are 'safe'?

I think they should .......... but suspect that they don't!

Dave

--
"Jeff Richards" <JRichards@msn.com.au> wrote in message
news:%239rnDSlAJHA.5380@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
Quote:
and can you also please note that it is much easier for MS to remove the
original spam if there are no replies to it.
--
Jeff Richards
MS MVP (Windows - Shell/User)
"Dan" <Dan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:0A6F6BA1-6F0E-4D37-9FA7-EDB9A1FB575E@microsoft.com...
Good, BD and Gary -- how about you guys -- forgive -- shake hands and let
us
move on --- yes -- Microsoft removed the original spam -- end of story



 

 
Dan
PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:54 pm    Post subject: Re: No Thanks for the Spam
       
Enough!, BD, Jeff is good. The mvps are good and I have only had issues
between myself and Gary S. Terhune recently and I view that as the past when
my thyroid had issues. It still has issues but I am working with the medical
community to maintain and stabilize it as best as I can.

Please Note: If you do continue on this route, I will be forced to ignore
you which I would rather not do since I have not even had to do that with
b_nice and b_nice may be knowledgeable but b_nice does not have any manners
in the newsgroups and is one of the very few who have been rude to me in the
past. I have hurt Gary and he has hurt me and hopefully someday we will be
able to look back and smile or maybe even laugh on the past but that day is
not today.

BTW, if you want me even to consider signing up for the newsgroup that you
suggested, your view is not my view of the world. I view myself as the
peacemaker in the 98 general newsgroup if that is at all possible in a
newsgroup.

"~BD~" wrote:

Quote:
Your comment is noted, Jeff.

Are you, kind of, suggesting that employees of Microsoft do, in fact,
monitor what happens in these newsgroups (Communities), check the advice
posted and make sure all links posted are 'safe'?

I think they should .......... but suspect that they don't!

Dave

--
"Jeff Richards" <JRichards@msn.com.au> wrote in message
news:%239rnDSlAJHA.5380@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
and can you also please note that it is much easier for MS to remove the
original spam if there are no replies to it.
--
Jeff Richards
MS MVP (Windows - Shell/User)
"Dan" <Dan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:0A6F6BA1-6F0E-4D37-9FA7-EDB9A1FB575E@microsoft.com...
Good, BD and Gary -- how about you guys -- forgive -- shake hands and let
us
move on --- yes -- Microsoft removed the original spam -- end of story






 

Page 1 of 2 .:. Goto page 1, 2  Next

Google
 
Webnews.only-4-geeks.com

Windows Update | C++ | C | PHP | JavaScript | Photoshop | Programming | Windows 2000 | Python | Windows XP | Object | Flash | Flash - ActionScript | Paint Shop Pro | Excel | PowerPoint | Access | Word | Windows 98 | Internet Explorer 6.0 | CorelDraw12 | Java | XML | asm x86 | Linux Mandrake | Linux RedHat | Outlook |  | news from newsgroups |_ | s

Web Templates

Awesome Website Templates ©

Swinoujscie oprocentowanie lokat sprzedaż samochodu wózki widłowe długopisy